You're viewing all posts tagged with supreme court

The SCOTUS rulings have firmly stated that the government can’t promote religion over non-religion as a part of the establishment clause.


See WALLACE v. JAFFREE, 472 U.S. 38, 53 (1985)(“[T]he individual freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any religious faith or none at all“); see also County of Allegheny v. ACLU Greater Pittsburgh Chapter, 492 U.S. 573, 589-94, 598-602 (1989); Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1, 17 (1989); Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488, 495 (1961).

Sgt. Justin Griffith, here
There aren’t a lot of us, but something like one out of six Americans calls himself a nonbeliever. Holy moly! That means we would still be underrepresented with just one justice. But those of us who refuse to subscribe to any religious hocus-pocus would be happy to take what we can get in a country where seemingly no politician, from either party, can resist the temptation of ending a speech with the empty phrase ‘God bless America.’
M
godisnotgreat:

Supreme Court Rules that a Cross is Not a Symbol of Christianity

WTF, Scalia?  That’s the most absurd argument I’ve ever heard.

“It’s alarming that the high court continues to undermine the separation  of church and state. Nothing good can come from this trend.”

Agreed.  The framers of the Constitution have got to be rolling in their graves right about now.

godisnotgreat:

Supreme Court Rules that a Cross is Not a Symbol of Christianity

WTF, Scalia?  That’s the most absurd argument I’ve ever heard.

“It’s alarming that the high court continues to undermine the separation of church and state. Nothing good can come from this trend.”

Agreed.  The framers of the Constitution have got to be rolling in their graves right about now.

(this post was reblogged from godisnotgreat)